Sunday, May 5, 2024

The largest fish we never see

When we think of the largest fish in the fraser river, we think of great chinook salmon, which may reach lengths of 3 feet, and weigh 20 pounds.  There are yet fish even larger than this - the white sturgeon.

Occasionally, they die (of either natural or manmade causes) and float downstream and may get tangled up in the lower-flow of the intertidal fraser.



Last year, a four foot specimen washed up not far from where I live. Knowing that sturgeon sometimes have tags in their heads, I notified the Fraser River Sturgeon Conservation Society to see if they'd like to check it out.  Steve, a volunteer with the organization, came out the next day. The high tide left little room for us to access the fish, with thorny bramble on one side, and water on the other, but with some amount of bouldering, we were able to access the fish.  We were not only able to get some measurements (130cm long, 53 cm girth), but his handheld sensor located a PIT tag located in the head, that told us this fish had been caught before, near Maple Ridge in 2010.


Steve said that sturgeon are among the most studied fish in the world.  The Fraser river's proximity to major population centres, its historic fishing importance, it's large enough size for tracking individuals,  and a generally charismatic creature of the Fraser has made it a popular target of study.  For example, in 2020, nearly 4000 tagged sturgeon were captured, providing valuable data for conservation purposes.

For more information of the Fraser River sturgeon, including the tagging program, see here: https://www.frasersturgeon.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Lower-Fraser-Sturgeon-M-and-A-2020-Report_20211024.pdf

skate


As we are in the midst of playoff hockey, this post will probably get more accidental clicks from those looking for hockey-related terms, than from those interested in an ID for a fish carcass.

Last week, while walking on a rocky beach near UBC, I saw this near the low tide mark.
Carcass of something (I put it on a rock for a better photo)

While most of this organism was gone, what remained was its backbone, and a tail. I recognized its thorny tail as belonging to a skate.

Skates are one of many creatures in our waters whose existence is unknown by the general public. They seldom get caught by fisherman on piers, they don't appear at the surface, and they live too deeply to get caught in tide pools.

Skates are in the same class of animals as sharks. They share features like a cartilaginous skeleton, and a rough skin of denticles. However, their flattened body makes them well-suited for staying camouflaged on the bottom, eating crustaceans and other benthic (ocean-bottom dwelling) creatures.

Complete, one might look like this:

Big skate (image from wikipedia)

Oh wait, you're thinking, that looks like a sting ray!  Indeed, they are similar to rays in many ways, but with some differentiations:
- skates have teeth; rays have plates more suited for crushing
- skates have stockier tails with thorny protrusions, and rays have more whip-like tails that may or may not have a stinger
- skates produce egg cases, while rays give birth to live young

There are a few common species of skates in our waters, but I can't find any closeups of tails that would help me narrow down the species of the one I saw.

Saturday, September 10, 2022

Eat or (one day) be eaten

Before I developed a passion for the creatures of the ocean, before I discovered what exciting predators spiders could be, before I collected charismatic crayfish from a local lake, grasshoppers occupied my desire of discovery.  They were the first creature I had ever studied up close.  As a six year old in the Okanagan, I spent hours each day, stalking them, capturing them, and keeping them in a 4-litre ice cream bucket padded with fresh grass where I'd watch them continue their life cycle of mating, laying eggs, and ultimately dying.

Capturing them required a strategy to combine stealth to get within striking distance, and a quickness of hands. This difficulty setting contributed to a ranking system I developed to classify grasshoppers and locusts.

What I called grasshoppers were the lowest tier.  They were the smallest of the bunch, and also the most common.  Their clear wings could typically only carry them in a straight line that curved right or left, and not more than 5 metres.  It was easy enough to flush one out, run to where it landed and pounce.  While they technically were flying, it was the "hop" that determined their direction, so I called them grasshoppers.

Locusts were what I called the species that could truly fly (I didn't find out until later that locusts were defined more by their swarming behaviour, but let's just let that 6-year old's definition stick for the next few paragraphs).  Their strong flight easily beckoned my 6-year-old self into running after them.  The most common locust species is a large, grey species that can fly long distances.  It's large size is also what makes it easiest to catch, as their momentum tends to (but not always) carry them in a predictable direction.  Their open wings reveal a black wing with a yellow band.

Carolina locust

While the carolina locust was abundant, it's flights were relatively quiet. In the dry Okanagan heat, it was instead another type of locust that would break the silence in the hot summers. These smaller locusts (there were several different species) would hover in a courtship flight, all the while producing a crackling sound technically called a crepitation.  The crackling sounded similar to rapidly ticking sound of those large radial sprinklers.  Their wings would typically have colour on the proximal (closer to body) regions, and be clear on the outer edges.  The wing colour could be yellow (rank 3), red (rank 2) or even blue (I'd cheer).

Unsure of species, maybe one in the Trimerotropis genus

These smaller species were also more agile.  Maybe as an evolutionary advantage to respond to their boisterous cackles while in flight, they would leap away well before I could get in striking distance.  My only strategy was to chase them in flight, and hope that they landed on a lawn where they'd be without a firm footing from which to make their next leap.

There were other species of grasshoppers that were exceptionally rare to catch. I came across just a handful of odd-looking slant-faced grasshoppers which were well camouflaged amid the tumbleweed. Even getting one to jump, it would be easy to dismiss it as a part of a plant that broke off.

So back to the name, "locust", which I'll now describe more accurately.  One of more destructive behaviours of some species of grasshoppers is swarming across an area, and leaving destroyed crops in its wake. This swarming behaviour is only in about 17 species of grasshopper, which are properly called locusts. In densities of 12-24 grasshoppers per square metre in an acre, they can eat as much as a cow.  Whether it be the pharaoh who wouldn't let the Israelites leave, or today's wheat farmers, these swarming grasshoppers can strike fear in the damage they can cause; they are most formidable for what they eat.

Their abundance is also what might turn them into an important food source for humans.  People in many parts of the world already eat grasshoppers as a readily available source of protein, and as we inevitably run out of grazing land, the human population will be increasingly dependent on insect sources of protein.  I myself have eaten a grasshopper, back when I went through a survivalist phase.  "Nutty" is how I'd describe the taste.



Today, when I see grasshoppers, I still try to challenge myself to catch them.  I'm bigger, and more cunning I tell myself.  Yet it hasn't gotten any easier.

Wednesday, December 29, 2021

backyard birds

The seed's been out in our new feeder since Christmas, when our daughter found seed in her stocking for the feeder, but the birds only noticed it today. It was non-stop activity for the entire afternoon.


 
dark-eyed junco

has the chest feathers of a female house sparrow, but the head striping doesn't match

male and female dark eyed junco

one of the prettier visitors, a house finch

the small chickadees were the most timid

 I think it was our childhood subscription to Chickadee magazine that conditioned me to believe chickadees live in naturally snowy climates, so I was satisfied to have snapped a photo while the snow is still around.